Fuzzy Random Utility Choice Models: The Case of Telecommuting Suitability

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Transportation Planning Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University

2 Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Random utility models have been widely used in many diverse fields. Considering utility as a random variable opened many new analytical doors to researchers in explaining behavioral phenomena. Introducing and incorporating the random error term into the utility function had several reasons, including accounting for unobserved variables. This paper incorporates fuzziness into random utility models to account for the imprecision of data intrinsic in human perception and statement. Fuzzy variables are contrasted with random variables, and a model is presented of relationships among real, perceived, and stated/reported conditions. The proposed fuzzy approach is applied to modeling telecommuting suitability, using data gathered from 242 employees in Tehran, Iran to construct fuzzy membership functions of job-tasks to the fuzzy set of telecommuting suitability. The resulting utility function can be viewed as representing the global wisdom of respondents. The enhancement in the fuzzy random utility model results, although modest, is promising and sets the stage for further research in the field of fuzzy logit models.

Keywords

References

- Bernardino, A. and Ben-Akiva, M. (1996) “Modeling the process of adoption of telecommuting: Comprehensive framework”, Transportation Research Record 1552, pp. 161-170.
- Bierlaire, M., Burton, D. and Lotan, T. (1993) “On the behavioral aspects of modal choices”, Report 93/22, http://www.mit.edu:8001/people/dburton/docs/bbl.ps.gz.
- Dubois, D. and Prade, H. (1988) “Possibility theory”, Plenum, New York, USA.
- Kosko, B. (1993) “Fuzzy thinking”, Hyperion, New York.
- Kruse, R. and Meyer, K. (1987) “Statistics with vague data”, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
- Lien, C. and Chen, Y. (2002) “A housing location choice model combined with a fuzzy linguistic scale”, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 648-654.
- Mahmassani, H. S., Yen, J., Herman, R. and Sullivan, M. A. (1993) “Employee attitudes and stated preferences toward telecommuting: An exploratory analysis”, Transportation Research Record 1413, pp. 31-41.
- Mamdoohi, A. R, Kermanshah, M. and Poorzahedy, H. (2006) “Telecommuting suitability modeling: An approach based on the concept of abstract job”, Transportation, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 329-346.
- Mokhtarian P. L. and Salomon, I. (1994) “Modeling the choice of telecommuting: Setting the context”, Environment and Planning A, 26, pp. 749-766.
- Mokhtarian, P. L. and Salomon, I. (1996) “Modeling the choice of telecommuting 2: A case of the preferred impossible alternative”, Environment and Planning A 28, pp. 1859-1876.
Pawlak, Z. (1991) “Rough sets”, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA, USA.
- Shafer, G. (1976) “A mathematical theory of evidence”, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.
- Singh, P., Paleti, R., Jenkins, S. and  Bhat, C. R. (2013) “On modeling telecommuting behavior: Option, choice and frequency”. Transportation, Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 373–396.
- Teodorovic, D. (1999) “Fuzzy logic systems for transportation engineering: The state of the art”, Transportation Research, Part A, Vol. 33, No. 5, pp.337-364.
- Tzeng, G. H., Chiu, Y. C. and Chen, J. J. (1997) “Integrating model of fuzzy stated preference”, Journal of Chinese Society for Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 39-51.
- Walls, M., Safirova, E. and  Jiang, Y. (2007) “What drives telecommuting? Relative impact of worker demographics,  employer characteristics and job types”, Transportation Research Record, No. 2010, pp. 111–120.
- Wang, Z. and Klir, G. (1992) “Fuzzy measure theory”, Plenum, New York, USA.
- Yen, J., Mahmassani, H. S. and Herman, R. (1994) “Employer attitudes and stated preferences toward telecommuting: An exploratory analysis”, Transportation Research Record, 1463, pp. 15-25.
- Waley, P. (1991) “Statistical reasoning with imprecise probabilities”, Chapman and Hall, London.
- Wu, S. W. (1998) “A study of pedestrians choice model toward the types of the sidewalk in CBD”, Taiwan NSC Research Project, NSC-87-2415-H-009-003.
- Yen, J. and Mahmassani, H. S. (1997) “Telecommuting adoption: Conceptual framework and model estimation”, Transportation Research Record 1606, pp. 95-102.
- Zadeh,  L. A. (1965) “Fuzzy sets”, Information and Control, Vol. 8, pp. 338-353.
- Zadeh, L. A. (1996) “Fuzzy logic=Computing with words”, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 4, pp.103-111.
- Zimmerman, H. J. (1991) “Fuzzy set theory and its applications”, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA, USA.
International Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 1, Issue 4 - Serial Number 4
April 2014
Pages 255-270

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics