A Novel Method for Measuring the Quality of Temporal Integration in Public Transport Systems

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D Candidate, School of Natural and Built Environments, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia

2 Senior lecturer of Transport Engineering, School of Natural and Built Environments, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia

3 Research Fellow, School of Computer Science, Engineering and Mathematics, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia

Abstract

Temporal coordination of services, as a crucial aspect of integration in public transport systems, has always been a big concern for transit planners and schedulers. One of the major issues in the way of coordinating transit services is the lack of a robust measure of effectiveness for assessing the quality of temporal coordination in public transport systems. Even though the network-wide summation of transfer waiting times is commonly used as a measure for this purpose, this index is not always calculable particularly when transferring passengers count is unavailable. This paper aims to present a practical method for quantifying the level of temporal coordination in transit systems, even in the absence of transfers count data. In this paper, first the timetable coordination indices proposed in the literature are evaluated and discussed. Then, a quantitative index is mathematically developed based on the actual waiting time incurred by transferring passengers in transit systems. A numerical example is also presented to examine the applicability of the proposed index. The results of this application revealed this index could be reliably used as a measure of effectiveness for assessing the level of coordination between public transport services, as well as for evaluating the impacts of different timetabling scenarios on transit systems integration.

Keywords

References

- Castelli, L., Pesenti, R. and Ukovich, W. (2004) “Scheduling multimodal transportation systems”, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 155, No. 3, pp. 603-615.
-Ceder, A., Golany, B. and Tal, O. (2001) “Creating bus timetables with maximal synchronization”, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, vol. 35, No. 10, pp. 913-928.
-Ceder, A. and Perera, S. (2014) “Detecting and improving public-transit connectivity with case studies of two world sport events”, Transport Policy, vol. 33, pp. 96-109.
-Currie, G. and Bromley, L. (2005) “Developing measures of public transport schedule coordination quality”, Presented at published at the 28th Ausraliasian Transport Research Forum, Sydney, Australia.
-Fleurent, C.,  Lessard, R. and Seguin, L. (2004) “Transit timetable synchronization: evaluation and optimization”,  Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Computer-Aided Scheduling of Public Transport (CASPT).
-Guihaire, V. and Hao, J-K. (2008) “Transit network design and scheduling: A global review”, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, vol. 42, No. 10, pp. 1251-1273.
-Poorjafari, V. and Yue, WL. (2013) “Synchronisation of public transport services: comparison of Methods”,  Preceedings of the 10th International Conference of Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies. EASTS Press, Taiwan.
-Tuzun Aksu, D. and Yılmaz, S. (2014) “Transit coordination with heterogeneous headways”, Transportation Planning and Technology, vol. 37, number. 5, pp. 450-465.
-Wu, Y., Tang, J., Yu, Y. and Pan, Z. (2015) “A stochastic optimization model for transit network timetable design to mitigate the randomness of traveling time by adding slack time”, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 52, pp. 15-31.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics