Analysis of Pedestrian Access on Transit-Oriented Development (Case Study: District 6 of Tehran)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Department of Road and Transportation Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Babol Noshirvani University of Technology, Babol, Iran

Abstract

Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) is considered one of the most comprehensive urban theories concerning land use and transportation. Improving pedestrian access and urban public transport is a key objective of TOD, leading to an enhanced level of TOD within a given zone. This study aims to examine the impact of pedestrian access on public transportation, particularly through access to transit stations. A range of indicators related to pedestrian access to public transportation, such as the service area of public transportation, number of transport stations, speed, parking availability, commercial density, residential density, public spaces, walking distance, connectivity, transport modes, slope, and population density, were collected for this purpose. The quantitative values for these indicators were subsequently computed for District 6 of Tehran (selected as a case study) utilizing ArcGIS. The aim was to determine the correlation between these indicators and the percentage of trips made using public transportation within the zone, serving as a functional criterion for assessing the level of TOD in the area. Subsequently, a model for pedestrian access modes to public transit in different zones was developed using the multi-layered perceptron neural network (MLP) technique. Based on the results, the network output with R=0.9517 and MSE=4.8881 indicated the satisfactory performance of the model. Furthermore, the sensitivity analysis results revealed the highest impact to be associated with parking, while the lowest impact was attributed to public spaces.

Keywords


- Ashrafian, A., Taheri Amiri, M. J., Rezaie-Balf, M, Ozbakkaloglu, T., & Lotfi-Omran O. (2018) Prediction of compressive strength and ultrasonic pulse velocity of fiber reinforced concrete incorporating nano silica using heuristic regression methods. Construction and Building Materials, 190, 479–494.
 
- Azmoodeh, M., & Haghighi, F. (2017) Land Use Evaluation Based on Transportation Accessibility (Case Study: Zone 6 of Tehran). Journal of Research and Urban Planning, 8, 135–148.
 
- Behbahani, H., & Haghighi, F. (2009) Presentation of Land-use and Traffic Efficiency Assessment. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management, 17(2), Ia–Ii.
 
- Bertolini, L., & Spit, T. (2005) Cities on rails: The redevelopment of railway stations and their surroundings. Routledge.
 
- Calthorpe, p. (1993) The Next American Metropolis (ecology, community and American dream). Princeton, Princeton Architectural Press.
 
- Cervero, R., & Kockelman, K. (1997) Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, Diversity, and Design. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 2, 199–219.
 
- Cervero, R., & Day, J. (2008) Suburbanization and transit-oriented development in China. Transport Policy 15 (5), 315–323.
- Daniels, R., & Mulley, C. (2013) Explaining walking distance to public transport: The dominance of public transport supply, The journal of transport and land use, 6 (2), 5-20.
 
- Dittmar, H., & Ohland, G. (2012). The new transit town: best practices in transitoriented development. Island Press.
 
- García-Palomares, J., Gutiérrez, J., & Cardozo, O. (2013) Walking accessibility to public transport: an analysis based on microdata and GIS. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, vol 40, 1087-1102.
 
- Godarzi, A A., Madadi Amiri, R., Talaei, A. & Jamasb, T. (2014) Predicting oil price movements: A dynamic Artificial Neural Network approach. Energy Policy, 68, 371-382.
 
- Hasibuana, H., Soemardia, T., Koestoerb, R. & Moersidikc, S. (2014) The Role of Transit Oriented Development in constructing urban environment sustainability, the case of Jabodetabek, Indonesia. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 20, 622-631.
 
- Huisman, O., & Rolf, A. Principles of Geographic Information Systems, An introductory textbook, Fourth edition, ITC, Enschede, 2009.
 
- Institute for Transportation and Development Policy, TOD Standard, 3rd ed. New York: ITDP, www.itdp.org (2017).
 
- Kia, M. (2011) Neural Networks in MATLAB. Green Computer Publishing Services.
 
- Loo, B., Chen, C., & Chan, E. (2010) Rail-based transit-oriented development: Lessons from New York City andHong Kong. Landscape and Urban Planning, 97, 202–212.
 
- Lyu, G., Bertolini, L., & Pfeffer, K. (2016) Developing a TOD typology for Beijing metro station areas. Journal of Transport Geography, 55, 40–50.
 
- Mavoa, S., Witten, K., McCreanor, T. & O’Sullivan, D. (2012) GIS based destination accessibility via public transit and walking in Auckland, New Zealand. Journal of Transport Geography, 20, 15-22.
 
- Motieyan, H., & Saadi Mesgari, M. (2018) An Agent-Based Modeling approach for sustainable urban planning from land use and public transit perspectives, Cities, 81, 91–100.
 
- Mu, R., & de Jong, M. (2010) Establishing the conditions for effective transit-oriented development in China: the case of Dalian, Landscape and Urban Planning, 97, 202–212.
 
- Mirzahossein, H., Rasafi, A., Sadeghi, K. & Safari, F. (2020) Overview of the Literature on the Transit-Oriented Development Policy to Investigate a Practical Solution for Traffic Congestion in Iran Cities. International Journal of Transportation Engineering, vol 7 (N28), 355-372.
 
- Ming Wey, W. (2015) Smart growth and transit-oriented development planning in site selection for a new metro transit station in Taipei, Taiwan. Habitat International, 47, 158-168.
 
- Municipality of District 6 Tehran, http://region6.tehran.ir, 2017.
 
- Nasri, A. & Zhang, L. (2014) The analysis of transit-oriented development (TOD) in Washington, D.C. and Baltimore metropolitan areas, Transport Policy, 32, 172–179.
 
- O’Sullivan, D. (2012) GIS based destination accessibility via public transit and walking in Auckland, New Zealand, Journal of Transport Geography, 20, 15-22.
 
- Padeiro, M., Louro, A. & Marques da Costa, N. (2019) Transit-oriented development and gentrification: a systematic review, Transport Reviews, 39:6, 733-754.
 
- Peiravian, F., Derrible, S., & Ijaz, F. (2014) Development and application of the Pedestrian Environment Index (PEI). Journal of Transport Geography, 39, 73-84.
 
- Rafiq, M.Y., Bugmann, G., & Easterbrook, D.J. (2001) Neural network design for engineering application, Computers & Structures, vol 79(17), 1541-1552.
 
- Shakiba, H., Khosravi, M., Tusi, T & Ajdari Moghaddam, M. (2015) Predicting the minimum temperature of Karaj station using data from remote link indices and artificial neural network, Natural Geography, 11 (40), 85-103.
 
- Singh, Y., Fard, P., Zuidgeest, M., Brussel, M., & Maarseveen, M. (2014) Measuring Transit oriented development: a spatial multi criteria assessment approach for the City Region Arnhem and Nijmegen, Journal of Transport Geography, 35, 130-143.
 
- Singh, Y., Lukman, A., Flacke, J., Zuidgeest, M. & Maarseveen, M.F.A.M. Van. (2017) Measuring TOD around transit nodes - Towards TOD policy. Transport Policy, 56, 96-111.
 
- Stojanovski, T. (2020) Urban design and public transportation – public spaces, visual proximity and Transit-Oriented Development (TOD). Journal of Urban Design, 25:1, 134-154.
 
- Sung, H., & Oh, J. (2011) Transit-oriented development in a high-density city: Identifying its association with transit ridership in Seoul, Korea. Cities, 28, 70–82.
 
- Teklemariam, E., & Shen, Z. (2020) Determining transit nodes for potential transit-oriented development: Along the LRT corridor in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, Frontiers of Architectural Research, 9, 606-622.
 
- Talavera-Garcia, R., & Soria-Lara, J. (2015) Q-PLOS, developing an alternative walking index. A method based on urban design quality, Cities, 45, 7-17.
 
- Yildirim, Y., & Jones Allen. D., & Arefi, M (2020) How does transit-oriented developments (TODs) deviate noise pollution of buildings? A comparative study of TODs and non-TODs. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 25390-25403.