Impact of Optimally Minimizing Delay Times on Safety at Signalized Intersections in Urban Areas, Case Study: The City of Virginia Beach

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Adjunct Assistant Professor, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Postdoctoral Research Assistant, Virginia Modeling, Analysis, and Simulation Center, Old Dominion University

2 Transportation Engineer, John A. Reif, Jr. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering New Jersey Institute of Technology

3 Director, Center for Innovative Transportation Solutions, Virginia Modeling, Analysis, and Simulation Center, Old Dominion University

Abstract

Optimally minimizing delay times at signalized intersections can significantly improve both traffic flow and safety. However, most traffic flow optimizing tools do not measure the effect on safety. This study uses nonlinear programming (NLP) algorithms to optimally minimize delay times and employs both Safety performance functions (SPFs) and empirical Bayes (EB) before-after methodology to measure the impact on safety presented as a Crash Modification Factor (CMF). A crash modification factor (CMF) is a multiplicative factor used by transportation practitioners to compute the expected number of crashes at specific study site(s) after a countermeasure has been proposed or is implemented. Using 2013 traffic data from seventeen signalized intersections located in Virginia Beach, the results show that optimally minimizing intersection delay times can result in a safety improvement of approximately 26.46% that is a CMF of 0.735. This result is not conclusive, but the significance of the findings shows the need for further investigations and potential inclusion in the future editions of the Highway Safety Manual (HSM).

Keywords


- AASHTO (2010) “Manual, highway safety “, Washington, DC 529.
- Biegler, L. T. and Rawlings, J. B. (1991) “Optimization approaches to nonlinear model predictive control  (No. ANL/CP-72735)”, Argonne National Lab., IL (USA).
- Elvik, R. (2008) “The predictive validity of empirical Bayes estimates of road safety”, Accident Analysis and Prevention, 40, No. 6, pp. 1964-1969.
- Gross, F., Persaud, B. and Lyon, C. (2010) “A guide to developing quality crash modification factors (No. FHWA-SA-10-032)”, Federal Highway Association.
- Hauer, E. (1995) “On exposure and accident rate”, Traffic Engineering and Control, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 134-138.
- Hauer, E. (1996) “Statistical test of difference between expected accident frequencies”, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1542, pp.24-29.
- Hauer, E., Bonneson, J., Council, F., Srinivasan, R. and Zegeer, C. (2012) “Crash modification factors: foundational issues”, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2279, pp.67-74.
- Lan, B., Persaud, B., Lyon, C. and Bhim, R. (2009) “Validation of a full Bayes methodology for observational before–after road safety studies and application to evaluation of rural signal conversions”. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 41, No. 3, pp.574-580.
- Lord, D. and Mannering, F. (2010) “The statistical analysis of crash-frequency data: a review and assessment of methodological alternatives”, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 44, No. 5, pp. 291-305.
- Luenberger, D. G. and Ye, Y. (2008) “Linear and nonlinear programming”, Vol. 116, Springer Science and Business Media.
- Navidi, W. C. (2008) “Statistics for engineers and scientists”, McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
- Park, B., Messer, C. and Urbanik, T. (1999) “Traffic signal optimization program for oversaturated conditions:
genetic algorithm approach”, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, (1683), pp.133-142.
- Persaud, B. and Lyon, C. (2007) “Empirical bayes before–after safety studies: lessons learned from two decades of experience and future directions”, Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 546-555.
- Poch, M. and Mannering, F. (1996) “Negative binomial analysis of intersection-accident frequencies”. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 122, No. 2, pp. 105-113.
- Roess, R. P., Prassas, E. S. and McShane, W. R. (2011) “Traffic engineering”, Transportation Research Board.
- Rouphail, N. M., Park, B. B. and Sacks, J. (2000). “Direct signal timing optimization: Strategy development and results”. In In XI Pan American Conference in Traffic and Transportation Engineering.
- Shahdah, U., Saccomanno, F. and Persaud, B. (2014) “Integrated traffic conflict model for estimating crash modification factors”, Accident Analysis and Prevention, 71, pp.228-235.
- Srinivasan, R., Council, F., Lyon, C., Gross, F., Lefler, N. and Persaud, B. (2008) “Safety effectiveness of selected treatments at urban signalized intersections”, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, (2056), 70-76.
- Stamatiadis, N. (2009) “Impact of shoulder width and median width on safety (Vol. 633)”, National Academies Press.
- Stevanovic, A., Stevanovic, J. and Kergaye, C. (2013) “Optimization of traffic signal timings based on surrogate measures of safety”, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging technologies, 32, pp.159-178.
- Tegge, R. A., Jo, J. H. and Ouyang, Y. (2010) “Development and application of safety performance functions for Illinois”, Illinois, Illinois Center for Transportation.
- Transportation Research Board (2010) “Highway capacity manual”, Washington, DC.
- Winston, W. L. and Goldberg, J. B. (2004) “Operations research: applications and algorithms (Vol. 3)”. Boston: Duxbury press.
- Wong, S. C., Sze, N. N. and Li, Y. C. (2007) “Contributory factors to traffic crashes at signalized intersections in Hong Kong”. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vo. 39, No. 6, pp. 1107-1113.
- Zhang, L. and Prevedouros, P. (2003) “Signalized intersection level of service incorporating safety risk”. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, (1852), pp.77-86.